Cloud Database Architect
NZ & ANZ
Architecture support for teams designing, modernising or stabilising business-critical database platforms across AWS, Oracle and PostgreSQL. The focus is practical: reliable architecture, clear trade-offs, migration readiness and operational runbooks that teams can actually use.
Available immediately for contract & partner subcontracting · Auckland / Remote ANZ
When to call me
A database architecture decision carries production risk
You need a second pair of senior eyes before committing to topology, migration path, HA/DR, capacity or managed-service assumptions.
- Architecture review
- Risk and trade-offs
- Decision support
Legacy and cloud systems need to meet safely
Oracle, PostgreSQL and AWS choices need to be made together, not in isolated teams.
- Oracle/PostgreSQL bridge
- AWS database options
- Migration roadmap
The design must survive real incidents
Architecture is not complete until failover, backups, monitoring, runbooks and support ownership are clear.
- HA/DR validation
- Operational model
- Runbook design
Architecture areas I cover
RDS, Aurora and managed database patterns
Aurora PostgreSQL, RDS, DMS, RDS Proxy, backup/restore, monitoring, cost and platform governance.
- AWS database design
- Cost-aware options
- Operational resilience
Oracle and PostgreSQL depth
Oracle RAC/Data Guard/GoldenGate/Exadata background plus PostgreSQL/Aurora design and performance considerations.
- Source platform depth
- Target-state design
- Performance implications
Make the plan buildable
Scope, sequencing, validation, rollout, rollback and stakeholder communication to reduce delivery surprises.
- Roadmap
- Risk register
- Implementation support
Typical deliverables
Architecture outputs
- Target-state architecture
- Risk-ranked recommendations
- HA/DR and backup posture review
- Capacity and cost considerations
Delivery support
- Migration or modernisation roadmap
- Change sequence and rollback view
- Validation and monitoring checklist
- Stakeholder-ready summary
Handover
- Runbook outline
- Operational responsibility map
- Knowledge transfer
- Next-step implementation options
Engagement model
Good fit for architecture review, migration strategy, partner bid support, or short-term contract ownership of database design and delivery planning.
The architecture principle
Design for operation, not diagrams
A database architecture is only useful if teams can monitor it, fail it over, recover it, tune it and explain it during pressure.
Make trade-offs visible
Cost, availability, performance, migration effort and team skill all compete. Good architecture names the trade-offs instead of hiding them.
Connect strategy to delivery
The output should become a buildable roadmap with dependencies, risks, validation checkpoints and decisions that project teams can actually execute.